Abstract: the exclusive role of combinatorics for the convergence of the ratio of private to public law regulation to achieve a balance of legal values in the implementation of criminal procedural coercion is given, as well as the further expansion of the use of conciliation in criminal proceedings. It is proposed that the implementation of justice in the form of “Crown Court” is rational and economically justified, which can become an addition to the current judicial system, implement effectively justice in accordance with the procedural economy for serious and especially serious crimes, and when considering civil cases in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts, “Crown Court” can be used for the claim price from 200 thousand rubles and from 1 million rubles, respectively. It is proposed to resolve the age-old inter-branch problem of law enforcement with a new separate form of legal proceedings by introducing branch judges that form the “Court of Law”.
The “Court of Law” is:
1) the judge-interpreter and applicant of criminal law, alone in the Advisory room gives an independent, impartial assessment of the observance of legal enforcement at all stages of the proceedings and prepares a reasoned opinion in strict accordance with the branch of law, signs it;
2) the judge-interpreter and applicant of criminal procedure law, alone in the consultation room gives an independent, impartial assessment of compliance with criminal procedure law at all stages of the proceedings and prepares a reasoned opinion in strict accordance with the branch of law, signs it;
3) the constitutional judge-the interpreter and the applicant of the constitutional law, individually in the Advisory room gives an independent, impartial assessment of compliance with the provisions of the Constitution of the Russian Federation at all stages of legal proceedings and prepares a reasoned opinion in strict accordance with the branch of law, signs it.
The “Court of Fact” is the jury in the amount of five people. The numerical ratio of “Court of Law” and “Court of Fact” is resolved according to the Fibonacci formula as three to five, which together form a “Crown Court”.
It seems that the advantage of this concept of justice implementation and its main task is to observe the rule of individual-branch, objective and impartial legal interpretation before law enforcement at all stages of legal proceedings.
Keywords: constitutional legal regulation, criminal procedure enforcement, balance of private and public legal regulation, combinatorics of correlation convergence, branch judges, “Court of Law”, “Court of Fact”, “Crown Court”, Fibonacci formula